Infelicitous Cancellation: The Explicit Cancellability Test for Conversational Implicature Revisited

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper questions the adequacy of the explicit cancellability test for conversational implicature as it is commonly understood. The standard way of understanding this test relies on two assumptions: first, that that one can test whether a certain content is conversationally implicated, by checking whether that content is cancellable, and second, that a cancellation is successful only if it results in a felicitous utterance. While I accept the first of these assumptions, I reject the second one. I argue that a cancellation can succeed even if it results in an infelicitous utterance, and that unless we take this possibility into account we run the risk of misdiagnosing philosophically significant cases.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-08-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
365 ( #13,254 of 53,518 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #19,750 of 53,518 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.