The communication desideratum and theories of indexical reference

Mind and Language 30 (4):474–499 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to the communication desideratum (CD), a notion of semantic content must be adequately related to communication. In the recent debate on indexical reference, (CD) has been invoked in arguments against the view that intentions determine the semantic content of indexicals and demonstratives (intentionalism). In this paper, I argue that the interpretations of (CD) that these arguments rely on are questionable, and suggest an alternative interpretation, which is compatible with (strong) intentionalism. Moreover, I suggest an approach that combines elements of intentionalism with other subjectivist approaches, and discuss the role of intuitions in developing and evaluating theories of indexical reference.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-08-25
Latest version: 2 (2015-09-03)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Almog, Joseph; Perry, John & Wettstein, Howard (eds.)
Demonstratives.Kaplan, David
Intentionality.Searle, John
Word and Object.Quine, W. V.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Metasemantics, Intentions and Circularity.Lewerentz, Lukas & Marschall, Benjamin

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
180 ( #14,127 of 37,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #14,018 of 37,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.