Must Understanding Be Coherent?

In Stephen Grimm, Christoph Baumberger & Sabine Ammon (eds.), Explaining understanding: new perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 139-164 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Several authors suggest that understanding and epistemic coherence are tightly connected. Using an account of understanding that makes no appeal to coherence, I explain away the intuitions that motivate this position. I then show that the leading coherentist epistemologies only place plausible constraints on understanding insofar as they replicate my own account’s requirements. I conclude that understanding is only superficially coherent.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KHAMUB
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-10
View other versions
Added to PP
2017-04-10

Downloads
575 (#13,255)

6 months
72 (#10,060)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?