Must Understanding Be Coherent?

In Stephen Grimm, Christoph Baumberger & Sabine Ammon (eds.), Explaining understanding: new perspectives from epistemology and philosophy of science. London, UK: Routledge. pp. 139-164 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Several authors suggest that understanding and epistemic coherence are tightly connected. Using an account of understanding that makes no appeal to coherence, I explain away the intuitions that motivate this position. I then show that the leading coherentist epistemologies only place plausible constraints on understanding insofar as they replicate my own account’s requirements. I conclude that understanding is only superficially coherent.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KHAMUB
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-04-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-04-10

Total views
355 ( #15,316 of 57,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #6,834 of 57,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.