Who Shouldn't Reduce Time's Arrow?

Erkenntnis:1-14 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Reductive accounts of the direction of time are often paired with Humean accounts of laws, while non-reductive accounts of time are often paired with anti-Humean accounts of laws. The traditional pairing of views has recently come under question. This paper aims to clarify what sorts of anti-Humean views motivate anti-reductionism about the direction of time. It is argued that those who think (i) that the laws are metaphysically fundamental, and (ii) that the laws contain time-asymmetric contents, should treat the arrow of time as metaphysically fundamental.

Author's Profile

Jake Khawaja
Princeton University


Added to PP

323 (#48,404)

6 months
168 (#15,505)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?