Hobbes's Struggle with Contractual Obligation. On the Status of the Laws of Nature in Hobbes's Work

Hobbes Studies 23 (2):105-123 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper argues that throughout his intellectual career, Hobbes remains unsatisfied with his own attempts at proving the invariant advisability of contract-keeping. Not only does he see himself forced to abandon his early idea that contractual obligation is a matter of physical laws. He also develops and retains doubts concerning its theoretical successor, the doctrine that the obligatoriness characteristic of contracts is the interest in self-preservation in alliance with instrumental reason - i.e. prudence. In fact, it is during his work on Leviathan that Hobbes notes the doctrine's main shortcoming, namely the limitation of its dialectical potential to cases in which contract-breakers are publicly identifiable. This essay shows Hobbes's doubts about his Leviathan's treatment of contractual obligation by way of a close reading of its central 15 th chapter and an analysis of some revealing shifts between the English Leviathan and the Latin edition. The paper ends by suggesting that Hobbes's awareness of the flaws at the heart of his political philosophy helps account for some striking changes in his latest writings.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KIEHSW
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-11-18
Latest version: 2 (2012-11-18)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On the Citizen.Hobbes, Thomas
Hobbes and the Foole.Hoekstra, Kinch

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-12-24

Total views
677 ( #2,978 of 38,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
123 ( #2,904 of 38,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.