What Kind of Perspectivism?

Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (4):415-443 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to perspectivism about moral obligation, our obligations are affected by our epistemic circumstances. But how exactly should this claim be understood? On Zimmerman’s “Prospective View”, perspectivism is spelled out as the thesis that an option is obligatory if and only if it maximizes what Zimmerman calls “prospective value”, which is in turn determined by the agent’s present evidence. In this article, I raise two objections to this approach. Firstly, I argue that spelling out the difference between perspectivism and anti-perspectivism in terms of value creates a number of problems that can be avoided by an account that proceeds in terms of reasons. Secondly, I argue that Zimmerman focuses on the wrong body of evidence, and that this commits him to an implausible solution to the problem that perspectivists face with regard to advice from better-informed sources.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KIEWKO
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-05-04
Latest version: 3 (2017-11-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-05-04

Total views
830 ( #4,041 of 51,341 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
118 ( #3,796 of 51,341 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.