You ought to φ only if you may believe that you ought to φ

Philosophical Quarterly 66 (265):760-82 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I present an argument for the claim that you ought to do something only if you may believe that you ought to do it. More exactly, I defend the following principle about normative reasons: An agent A has decisive reason to φ only if she also has sufficient reason to believe that she has decisive reason to φ. I argue that this principle follows from the plausible assumption that it must be possible for an agent to respond correctly to her reasons. In conclusion, I discuss some implications of this argument (given that some other standard assumptions about reasons hold). One such implication is that we are always in a position to be justified in believing all truths about what we have decisive reason (or ought) to do.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
Practical Reality.Dancy, Jonathan
Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology.Conee, Earl & Feldman, Richard
Why Be Rational?Kolodny, Niko

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Right and the Wrong Kind of Reasons.Gertken, Jan & Kiesewetter, Benjamin

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
573 ( #3,492 of 37,265 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
121 ( #2,553 of 37,265 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.