You ought to φ only if you may believe that you ought to φ

Philosophical Quarterly 66 (265):760-82 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I present an argument for the claim that you ought to do something only if you may believe that you ought to do it. More exactly, I defend the following principle about normative reasons: An agent A has decisive reason to φ only if she also has sufficient reason to believe that she has decisive reason to φ. I argue that this principle follows from the plausible assumption that it must be possible for an agent to respond correctly to her reasons. In conclusion, I discuss some implications of this argument (given that some other standard assumptions about reasons hold). One such implication is that we are always in a position to be justified in believing all truths about what we have decisive reason (or ought) to do.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
The Domain of Reasons.Skorupski, John

View all 70 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Normativity of Rationality.Kiesewetter, Benjamin
The Right and the Wrong Kind of Reasons.Gertken, Jan & Kiesewetter, Benjamin

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
658 ( #3,563 of 40,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
107 ( #4,118 of 40,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.