Why Group Membership Matters; A Critical Typology

Ethnicities (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The question of why group-differentiated rights might be a requirement of justice has been a central focus of identity politics in recent decades. I attempt to bring some clarity to this discussion by proposing a typology to track the various ways in which individuals can be harmed or benefited as a consequence of their membership in social groups. It is the well-being of individuals that group-differentiated rights should be understood as protecting, and so clarity on the relationship between group membership and well-being is vital. One of the problems with the way in which such justifications have often been formulated in the past has been that they inadvertently position the group as a handicap to be overcome, rather than a value to be protected. I seek to overcome this limitation by clearly specifying the circumstances under which group membership is a liability, and the circumstances under which it has value. While this distinction is important, in both cases there is a relevant interest at stake, and thus the groundwork can be laid for a defence of group-differentiated rights.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KILWGM
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-07-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-07-13

Total views
472 ( #11,463 of 58,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,173 of 58,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.