Narrative responsibility and moral dilemma: A case study of a family’s decision about a brain-dead daughter

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter’s desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a “narrative responsibility,” namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of loved ones. We suggest that moral dilemmas arise not only from conflicts between moral justifications but also from conflicts between narratives and human relationships
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-06-02
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
131 ( #36,769 of 2,433,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #59,958 of 2,433,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.