A New, Better BET: Rescuing and Revising Basic Emotion Theory

Frontiers in Psychology 9:1-12 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Basic Emotion Theory, or BET, has dominated the affective sciences for decades (Ekman, 1972, 1992, 1999; Ekman and Davidson, 1994; Griffiths, 2013; Scarantino and Griffiths, 2011). It has been highly influential, driving a number of empirical lines of research (e.g., in the context of facial expression detection, neuroimaging studies and evolutionary psychology). Nevertheless, BET has been criticized by philosophers, leading to calls for it to be jettisoned entirely (Colombetti, 2014; Hufendiek, 2016). This paper defuses those criticisms. In addition, it shows that we have good reason to retain BET. Finally, it reviews and puts to rest worries that BET’s commitment to affect programs renders it outmoded. We propose that, with minor adjustments, BET can avoid such criticisms when conceived under a radically enactive account of emotions. Thus, rather than leaving BET behind, we show how its basic ideas can be revised, refashioned and preserved. Hence, we conclude, our new BET is still a good bet.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KIRANB
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Model for Basic Emotions Using Observations of Behavior in Drosophila.Gu, Simeng; Wang, Fushun; Patel, Nitesh P.; Bourgeois, James A. & Huang, Jason H.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-07-17

Total views
138 ( #19,233 of 39,608 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #6,920 of 39,608 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.