Love, Plural Subjects & Normative Constraint

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Andrea Westlund's account of love involves lovers becoming a Plural Subject mirroring Margaret Gilbert's Plural Subject Theory. However, while for Gilbert the creation of a plural will involves individuals jointly committing to pool their wills and the plural will directly normatively constraining those individuals, Westlund, in contrast, sees the creation of a plural will as a continual process thus rejecting the possibility of such direct normative constraint. This rejection appears to be required to explain the flexibility that allows for a central place for reciprocity in loving relationships. However, this paper argues against the existence of such flexibility and presents instead the case that variance in the normative pain of rebelling against the collective will can be accommodated by replacing Gilbert's notion of all-or-nothing pooling of wills with an account that see wills as becoming entangled through levels of identification with the plural subject.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-12-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Shared Cooperative Activity.Bratman, Michael E.
We-Intentions.Tuomela, Raimo & Miller, Kaarlo
How to Share an Intention.Velleman, J. David

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
234 ( #14,204 of 42,148 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #14,296 of 42,148 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.