Whose convenience? Whose truth?: A comment on Peter Singer's 'A convenient truth.'

201The Hastings Center Bioethics Forum, Wednesday, February 28, 2007.The Hastings Center Bioethics Forum (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
As parents of a young woman who very much resembles Ashley, we recognize the way her parents speak of their daughter’s preciousness, and of the love and joy she brings into their life. We know too well the hardships associated with rearing a child with severe physical and intellectual disabilities, especially in our own society, unyielding as it is to the medical needs even “normals” have. We would not have our daughter Sesha undergo similar interventions. We do not believe she is a perpetual child, even if her intellectual capacities do not exceed those of a child, for she has lived for thirty-seven years in this world and with that has acquired knowledge, sensitivities, and sensibilities that no child of “comparable” capacities could have.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KITWCW
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-12-30

Total views
71 ( #40,865 of 53,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #42,313 of 53,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.