Is pain asymbolia a deficit or a syndrome? Historical reflections on an ongoing debate

Belgrade Philosophical Annual 36 (2):41-57 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nikola Grahek's influential book Feeling Pain and Being in Pain introduced philosophers to the strange phenomenon of pain asymbolia. Subsequent philosophical debate around asymbolia has been partly taxonomic: the deep question is whether it is best understood as a specific neurological deficit or part of a broader syndrome. This paper looks to the history of asymbolia, positioning the origin of the term within broader historical trends. It shows that strange phenomena about pain and motivation have always presented interpretive challenges, and suggests that the current debate mirrors a historical split between German and French traditions. This does not resolve the debate, but does help place it within broader scientific and philosophical contexts.

Author Profiles

Colin Klein
Australian National University
Alexandre Duval
Australian National University

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-07

Downloads
74 (#96,110)

6 months
74 (#74,137)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?