The complex act of projecting oneself into the future

WIREs Cognitive Science 4:63-79 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Research on future-oriented mental time travel (FMTT) is highly active yet somewhat unruly. I believe this is due, in large part, to the complexity of both the tasks used to test FMTT and the concepts involved. Extraordinary care is a necessity when grappling with such complex and perplexing metaphysical constructs as self and time and their co-instantiation in memory. In this review, I first discuss the relation between future mental time travel and types of memory (episodic and semantic). I then examine the nature of both the types of self-knowledge assumed to be projected into the future and the types of temporalities that constitute projective temporal experience. Finally, I argue that a person lacking episodic memory should nonetheless be able to imagine a personal future by virtue of (a) the fact that semantic, as well as episodic, memory can be self-referential, (b) autonoetic awareness is not a prerequisite for FMTT, and (c) semantic memory does, in fact, enable certain forms of personally-oriented FMTT.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLETCA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-02-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What Memory Is.Stan Klein - 2015 - WIREs Cognitive Science 6 (1):1-38.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-02-25

Total views
1,117 ( #1,642 of 41,490 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
229 ( #1,578 of 41,490 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.