What can Recent Replication Failures tell us about the Theoretical Commitments of Psychology?

Theory and Psychology 24:326-338 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I suggest that the recent, highly visible, and often heated debate over failures to replicate the results in the social sciences reveals more than the need for greater attention to the pragmatics and value of empirical falsification. It also is a symptom of a serious issue -- the underdeveloped state of theory in many areas of psychology. While I focus on the phenomenon of “social priming” -- since it figures centrally in current debate -- it is not the only area of psychological inquiry to which my critique applies. I first discuss some of the key issues in the “social priming” debate and then attempt to show that many of the problems thus far identified are traceable to a lack of specificity of theory. Finally, I hint at the possibility that adherence to the materialist tenets of modern psychological theory may have a limiting effect on our full appreciation of the phenomena under scrutiny.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KLEWCR
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-01-31
Latest version: 3 (2014-06-14)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Remembering with and Without Memory: A Theory of Memory and Aspects of Mind That Enable its Experience.Stan Klein - 2018 - Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Practice and Research 5:117-130.
The Unplanned Obsolescence of Psychological Science and an Argument for its Revival.Stan Klein - 2016 - Pyshcology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 3:357-379.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-31

Total views
1,000 ( #2,233 of 43,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
116 ( #4,053 of 43,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.