William James's Objection to Epiphenomenalism

Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1179–1190 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
James developed an evolutionary objection to epiphenomenalism that is still discussed today. Epiphenomenalists have offered responses that do not grasp its full depth. I thus offer a new reading and assessment of James’s objection. Our life-essential, phenomenal pleasures and pains have three features that suggest that they were shaped by selection, according to James: they are natively patterned, those patterns are systematically linked with antecedent brain states, and the patterns are “universal” among humans. If epiphenomenalism were true, phenomenal patterns could not have been selected (because epiphenomenalism precludes phenomenal consciousness affecting reproductive success). So epiphenomenalism is likely false.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-12-12
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #39,813 of 54,708 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #23,971 of 54,708 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.