In Defense of Aristotle's Notion of Eudaimonia as an Activity of Contemplation

Archeology and Anthropology Open Access 4 (5):664-70 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper addresses claims that Aristotle's notion of happiness is inconsistent given his expositions of happiness in Book I and Book X of NE. It argues that such claims are rooted in the erroneous conclusion that Aristotle defines happiness in Book I as living a "good life", and an unwarranted assumption that when Aristotle identifies happiness with contemplation, he has a professional philosopher in mind and contemplation as an activity one engages in leisurely and as a means of intellectual conditioning. It further argues that happiness as Aristotle understands it is a reward for cultivating virtuous character and though everyone has the capacity for it, only few will attain happiness since it requires exertion and effort and many are unwilling to prioritize such acquisition.

Author's Profile

Atina Knowles
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-19

Downloads
247 (#78,046)

6 months
100 (#56,103)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?