Phenomenal Contrast: A Critique

American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):321-334 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In some philosophical arguments an important role is played by the claim that certain situations differ from each other with respect to phenomenology. One class of such arguments are minimal pair arguments. These have been used to argue that there is cognitive phenomenology, that high-level properties are represented in perceptual experience, that understanding has phenomenology, and more. I argue that facts about our mental lives systematically block such arguments, reply to a range of objections, and apply my critique to some examples from the literature.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2011-01-07
Latest version: 4 (2014-12-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Recent Issues in High-Level Perception.Grace Helton - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (12):851-862.
Consciousness and Intentionality.Angela Mendelovici & David Bourget - forthcoming - In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
First-Person Experiments: A Characterisation and Defence.Brentyn J. Ramm - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9:449–467.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
555 ( #4,783 of 41,616 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #5,778 of 41,616 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.