A Fatal Dilemma For Direct Realist Foundationalism

Journal of Philosophical Research 40:405-440 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Direct realist versions of foundationalism have recently been advocated by Pryor, Huemer, Alston, and Plantinga. DRF can hold either that our foundational observation beliefs are about the simple perceptible qualities of objects, or that our foundational observation beliefs are more complex ones about objects in the world. I will show that whether our observational beliefs are simple or complex, the agent must possess other epistemically significant states in order for these observational beliefs to be justified. These other states are therefore epistemically prior to observation belief, and prevent them from being epistemically foundational.

Author's Profile

Jeremy Koons
Georgetown University


Added to PP

242 (#56,020)

6 months
109 (#29,211)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?