Reply to holtz

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In "The Compatibility of Naturalism and Scientific Realism" (Dec. 2003) , Brian Holtz offers two objections to my argument in "The Incompatibility of Naturalism and Scientific Realism" (in Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal , edited by William Lane Craig and J. P. Moreland, Routledge, 2000). His responses are: (1) my argument can be deflected by adopting a pragmatic or empiricist "definition" of "truth", and (2) the extra-spatiotemporal cause of the simplicity of the laws need not be God, or any other personal being.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KOORTH
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-08-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
52 ( #48,727 of 57,073 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,497 of 57,073 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.