Debunking arguments

Philosophy Compass 14 (12):e12638 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Debunking arguments—also known as etiological arguments, genealogical arguments, access problems, isolation objec- tions, and reliability challenges—arise in philosophical debates about a diverse range of topics, including causation, chance, color, consciousness, epistemic reasons, free will, grounding, laws of nature, logic, mathematics, modality, morality, natural kinds, ordinary objects, religion, and time. What unifies the arguments is the transition from a premise about what does or doesn't explain why we have certain mental states to a negative assessment of their epistemic status. I examine the common, underlying structure of the arguments and the different strategies for motivating and resisting the premises of debunking arguments.

Author's Profile

Daniel Z. Korman
University of California, Santa Barbara

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-11

Downloads
2,562 (#3,230)

6 months
598 (#2,283)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?