Debunking arguments

Philosophy Compass 14 (12) (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Debunking arguments—also known as etiological arguments, genealogical arguments, access problems, isolation objec- tions, and reliability challenges—arise in philosophical debates about a diverse range of topics, including causation, chance, color, consciousness, epistemic reasons, free will, grounding, laws of nature, logic, mathematics, modality, morality, natural kinds, ordinary objects, religion, and time. What unifies the arguments is the transition from a premise about what does or doesn't explain why we have certain mental states to a negative assessment of their epistemic status. I examine the common, underlying structure of the arguments and the different strategies for motivating and resisting the premises of debunking arguments.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KORDA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-12-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-12-11

Total views
450 ( #10,699 of 54,433 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
138 ( #3,554 of 54,433 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.