Fundamental Quantification and the Language of the Ontology Room

Noûs 49 (2):298-321 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Nihilism is the thesis that no composite objects exist. Some ontologists have advocated abandoning nihilism in favor of deep nihilism, the thesis that composites do not existO, where to existO is to be in the domain of the most fundamental quantifier. By shifting from an existential to an existentialO thesis, the deep nihilist seems to secure all the benefits of a composite-free ontology without running afoul of ordinary belief in the existence of composites. I argue that, while there are well-known reasons for accepting nihilism, there appears to be no reason at all to accept deep nihilism. In particular, deep nihilism draws no support either from the usual arguments for nihilism or from considerations of parsimony.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KORFQA
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-05-05
Latest version: 2 (2017-09-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 70 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Composition.Korman, Daniel Z. & Carmichael, Chad
Ordinary Objects.Korman, Daniel Z.
Knockdown Arguments.Ballantyne, Nathan

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-05-03

Total views
676 ( #3,533 of 41,479 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,416 of 41,479 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.