Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory

In Jean-Francois Bonnefon & Bastian Tremoliere (eds.), Moral Inference (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We argue that moral decision making is reasons-based, focusing on the idea that people encounter decisions as questions to be answered and that they process reasons to the extent that they can see them as putative answers to those questions. After introducing our topic, we sketch the erotetic reasons-based framework for decision making. We then describe three experiments that extend this framework to moral decision making in different question frames, cast doubt on theories of moral decision making that discount reasons and appeal, and replicate our initial finds in moral contexts that do not involve direct physical harm. We conclude by reinterpreting Stanley Milgram’s studies in destructive obedience in our new framework.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KORRMJ
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-02-06
Latest version: 3 (2016-04-13)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-02-06

Total views
204 ( #26,495 of 58,386 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #33,884 of 58,386 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.