Unrestricted Composition and Restricted Quantification

Philosophical Studies 140 (3):319-334 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Many of those who accept the universalist thesis that mereological composition is unrestricted also maintain that the folk typically restrict their quantifiers in such a way as to exclude strange fusions when they say things that appear to conflict with universalism. Despite its prima facie implausibility, there are powerful arguments for universalism. By contrast, there is remarkably little evidence for the thesis that strange fusions are excluded from the ordinary domain of quantification. Furthermore, this reconciliatory strategy seems hopeless when applied to the more fundamental conflict between universalism and the intuitions that tell against it.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2009-12-05
Latest version: 2 (2017-09-29)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.

View all 65 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Folk Mereology is Teleological.Rose, David & Schaffer, Jonathan
Composition.Korman, Daniel Z. & Carmichael, Chad

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
618 ( #4,083 of 41,601 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #19,161 of 41,601 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.