The Vagueness Argument Against Abstract Artifacts

Philosophical Studies 167 (1):57-71 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Words, languages, symphonies, fictional characters, games, and recipes are plausibly abstract artifacts— entities that have no spatial location and that are deliberately brought into existence as a result of creative acts. Many accept that composition is unrestricted: for every plurality of material objects, there is a material object that is the sum of those objects. These two views may seem entirely unrelated. I will argue that the most influential argument against restricted composition—the vagueness argument—doubles as an argument that there can be no abstract artifacts. There is no way to resist the vagueness argument against abstract artifacts that does not also undermine the vagueness argument against restricted composition.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-09-29
Latest version: 2 (2017-09-29)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
332 ( #19,459 of 2,448,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #32,804 of 2,448,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.