Why Care About What There Is?

In Javier Cumpa (ed.), The Question of Ontology: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There’s the question of what there is, and then there’s the question of what ultimately exists. Many contend that, once we have this distinction clearly in mind, we can see that there is no sensible debate to be had about whether there are such things as properties or tables or numbers, and that the only ontological question worth debating is whether such things are ultimate (in one or another sense). I argue that this is a mistake. Taking debates about ordinary objects as a case study, I show that the arguments that animate these debates bear directly on the question of which objects there are and cannot plausibly be recast as arguments about what’s ultimate. I also address the objection that, because they are easy answerable, questions about what there is cannot be a proper subject of ontological debate.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KORWCA
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-03-20
Latest version: 2 (2019-04-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Ontology Made Easy.Thomasson, Amie
On What Grounds What.Schaffer, Jonathan
Against Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 60 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-20

Total views
181 ( #17,310 of 41,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
181 ( #2,096 of 41,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.