Substance, Independence and Unity

In Edward Feser (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Palgrave/Macmillan. pp. 169-195 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I consider particular attempts by E. J. Lowe and Michael Gorman at providing an independence criterion of substancehood and argue that the stipulative exclusion of non-particulars and proper parts (or constituents) from such accounts raises difficult issues for their proponents. The results of the present discussion seem to indicate that, at least for the case of composite entities, a unity criterion of substancehood might have at least as much, and perhaps more, to offer than an independence criterion and therefore ought to be explored further by neo-Aristotelians in search of a defensible notion of substancehood. I indicated briefly how such a unity criterion might be used by neo-Aristotelians to support the inclusion of hylomorphic compounds in the category of substance, given the traditional role of form as the principle of unity within the compound.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KOSSIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-09-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Questions of Ontology.Koslicki, Kathrin

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-10-31

Total views
206 ( #20,470 of 48,767 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #19,202 of 48,767 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.