Moral nihilism and its implications

Journal of Mind and Behavior 38 (1):75-90 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Philosophers have identified a number of principles that characterize morality and underlie moral judgments. However, philosophy has failed to establish any widely agreed-upon justification for these judgments, and an “error theory” that views moral judgments as without justification has not been successfully refuted. Evolutionary psychologists have had success in explaining the likely origins and mechanisms of morality but have also not established any justification for adopting particular values. As a result, we are left with moral nihilism -- the absence of any unarguable values or behaviors we must or should adopt. The philosophical and psychological implications of this nihilism suggest accepting shared, non-absolute values as “good enough”; a revised, humbler view of moral and other value judgments; and the possible acceptance of the hard truth of a value nihilism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-07-19
Latest version: 7 (2017-10-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
515 ( #8,688 of 53,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #10,200 of 53,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.