Kantian Monism

Philosophical Papers 41 (1):23-56 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Abstract Let ?monism? be the view that there is only one basic object?the world. Monists face the question of whether there are also non-basic objects. This is in effect the question of whether the world decomposes into parts. Jonathan Schaffer maintains that it does, Terry Horgan and Matja? Potr? that it does not. In this paper, I propose a compromise view, which I call ?Kantian monism.? According to Kantian monism, the world decomposes into parts insofar as an ideal subject under ideal conditions would divide it into parts, but it does not decompose into parts in and of itself, that is, in an entirely mind-independent manner. After articulating Kantian monism more precisely (Section 1), I present a prima facie case for preferring it over more standard varieties of monism (Section 2)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KRIKM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Objectivity.Wright, Crispin
Against Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 41 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-06-17

Total views
513 ( #6,084 of 43,872 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #15,245 of 43,872 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.