Phenomenal Intentionality and the Perception/Cognition Divide

In Arthur Sullivan (ed.), Sensations, Thoughts, and Language: Essays in Honor of Brian Loar. New York: Routledge (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One of Brian Loar’s most central contributions to contemporary philosophy of mind is the notion of phenomenal intentionality: a kind of intentional directedness fully grounded in phenomenal character. Proponents of phenomenal intentionality typically also endorse the idea of cognitive phenomenology: a sui generis phenomenal character of cognitive states such as thoughts and judgments that grounds these states’ intentional directedness. This combination creates a challenge, though: namely, how to account for the manifest phenomenological difference between perception and cognition. In this paper, I argue that there is in fact no obvious account of this difference. I consider three main approaches: in terms of high-level vs. low-level contents, of conceptual vs. nonconceptual content, and of propositional vs. objectual content. After arguing against each, I conclude by considering the phenomenal-intentionalist’s options moving forward.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KRIPIA
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-06-22
Latest version: 4 (2018-08-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Modularity of Mind.Cummins, Robert & Fodor, Jerry
Mental Reality.Strawson, Galen

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-06-22

Total views
408 ( #7,094 of 40,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
190 ( #1,952 of 40,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.