The Epistemology of Intentionality: Notional Constituents vs. Direct Grasp

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Franz Brentano is well known for highlighting the importance of intentionality, but he said curiously little about the nature of intentionality. According to Mark Textor, there is a deep reason for this: Brentano took intentionality to be a conceptual primitive the nature of which is revealed only in direct grasp. Although there is certainly textual support for this interpretation, it appears in tension with Brentano’s repeated attempts to analyze intentionality in terms of ‘notional constituents’ – aspects of intentionality which cannot come apart in reality but which can be conceptually distinguished. After bringing out this tension, I explore some options for resolving it, ultimately offering my own favored interpretation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KRITEO-9
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-05-19
Latest version: 4 (2020-07-01)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-05-19

Total views
108 ( #32,674 of 51,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
108 ( #4,257 of 51,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.