The Underrepresentation of Women in Prestigious Ethics Journals

Hypatia 32 (4):928-939 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It has been widely reported that women are underrepresented in academic philosophy as faculty and students. This article investigates whether this representation may also occur in the domain of journal article publishing. Our study looked at whether women authors were underrepresented as authors in elite ethics journals — Ethics, Philosophy & Public Affairs, the Journal of Political Philosophy, and the Journal of Moral Philosophy — between 2004-2014, relative to the proportion of women employed in academic ethics (broadly construed). We found that women are indeed underrepresented overall in prestigious ethics journal publishing. Though this is not our focus, we discuss possible causes for this finding, such as top ethics journals’ tendency not to publish much feminist philosophy; the impact of women’s lesser professional status or rank within philosophy on their prospects for, and success in, journal publishing; and the review process itself, which may disadvantage or discourage women authors — perhaps especially when their gender, rank, and affiliation are known to the editor or reviewer, or if their work is explicitly feminist. We discuss possible avenues for future research on the "woman problem" in philosophy, noting how our study relates to existing research on this issue.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KRITUO-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-03-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why So Low?Leuschner, Anna

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-03-16

Total views
213 ( #15,092 of 41,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #12,474 of 41,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.