What is Metaphysical Equivalence?

Philosophical Papers 34 (1):45-74 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Abstract Theories are metaphysically equivalent just if there is no fact of the matter that could render one theory true and the other false. In this paper I argue that if we are judiciously to resolve disputes about whether theories are equivalent or not, we need to develop testable criteria that will give us epistemic access to the obtaining of the relation of metaphysical equivalence holding between those theories. I develop such ?diagnostic? criteria. I argue that correctly inter-translatable theories are metaphysically equivalent, and what we need are ways of determining whether a putative translation is correct or not. To that end I develop a number of tools we can employ to discern whether a translation is a correct one
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KRIWIM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Word and Object.Quine, W. V.
Material Beings.van Inwagen, Peter
Parts of Classes.Lewis, David Kellogg

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
184 ( #14,404 of 38,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #8,938 of 38,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.