Why Epistemic Permissions Don’t Agglomerate – Another Reply to Littlejohn

Logos and Episteme 4 (4):451–455 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Clayton Littlejohn claims that the permissibility solution to the lottery paradox requires an implausible principle in order to explain why epistemic permissions don't agglomerate. This paper argues that an uncontentious principle suffices to explain this. It also discusses another objection of Littlejohn's, according to which we’re not permitted to believe lottery propositions because we know that we’re not in a position to know them.
Reprint years
2013
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KROWEP
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2014-08-05)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
379 ( #7,484 of 39,928 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #14,890 of 39,928 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.