Coherentism and justified inconsistent beliefs: A solution

Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):21-41 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The most pressing difficulty coherentism faces is, I believe, the problem of justified inconsistent beliefs. In a nutshell, there are cases in which our beliefs appear to be both fully rational and justified, and yet the contents of the beliefs are inconsistent, often knowingly so. This fact contradicts the seemingly obvious idea that a minimal requirement for coherence is logical consistency. Here, I present a solution to one version of this problem.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2010-11-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
790 ( #4,262 of 50,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #11,585 of 50,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.