Religious Pluralism and the Buridan's Ass Paradox

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paradox of ’Buridan’s ass’ involves an animal facing two equally adequate and attractive alternatives, such as would happen were a hungry ass to confront two bales of hay that are equal in all respects relevant to the ass’s hunger. Of course, the ass will eat from one rather than the other, because the alternative is to starve. But why does this eating happen? What reason is operative, and what explanation can be given as to why the ass eats from, say, the left bale rather than the right bale? Why doesn’t the ass remain caught between the options, forever indecisive and starving to death? Religious pluralists face a similar dilemma, a dilemma that I will argue is more difficult to address than the paradox just described
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KVARPA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-11-29

Total views
250 ( #19,424 of 53,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,989 of 53,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.