Religious Pluralism and the Buridan's Ass Paradox

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):1-26 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paradox of ’Buridan’s ass’ involves an animal facing two equally adequate and attractive alternatives, such as would happen were a hungry ass to confront two bales of hay that are equal in all respects relevant to the ass’s hunger. Of course, the ass will eat from one rather than the other, because the alternative is to starve. But why does this eating happen? What reason is operative, and what explanation can be given as to why the ass eats from, say, the left bale rather than the right bale? Why doesn’t the ass remain caught between the options, forever indecisive and starving to death? Religious pluralists face a similar dilemma, a dilemma that I will argue is more difficult to address than the paradox just described

Author's Profile

Jonathan L. Kvanvig
Washington University in St. Louis

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-29

Downloads
395 (#21,522)

6 months
63 (#13,127)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?