Hiddenness, holiness, and impurity

Religious Studies 53 (2):239-259 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Schellenberg has advanced the hiddenness argument against God’s existence, based on the idea that an all-loving God would seek personal relationships. This paper develops a reply to Schellenberg’s argument by examining the notion of moral impurity, as understood by Paul the Apostle. Paul conceptualized moral impurity as a causal state that transfers from person to person, like a contagious disease. He also believed that moral impurity precludes divine-human relationship. The goal of this paper is to develop these ideas into a problem for one Schellenberg’s key premises.

Author's Profile

Brent G. Kyle
United States Air Force Academy

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-27

Downloads
243 (#79,314)

6 months
114 (#44,842)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?