Escepticismo y Desacuerdo

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 16 (1):81-97 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Within the framework of the epistemological debate on disagreement, this paper aims to examine the sceptical thesis that holds that, if it is impossible to rationally choose among two excluding positions, the only sensible or rational thing to do is to suspend judgement. The idea that ordinary life does not constitute the source of scepticism is presented, which rules out real disagreement between epistemic pairs as its foundation. Sceptical scenes differ ontologically from everyday scenes, without such ontological difference entailing an epistemic difference, since epistemic practices do not vary from one sceptical scene to other types of scenes.

Author's Profile

Rodrigo Laera
Universitat de Barcelona


Added to PP

363 (#24,925)

6 months
48 (#27,249)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?