Skepticism and Disagreement

In Diego E. Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 203-216 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Though ancient Pyrrhonian skepticism is apparently based on disagreement, this aspect of skepticism has been widely neglected in contemporary discussion on skepticism. The paper provides a rational reconstruction of the skeptical argument from disagreement that can be found in the books of Sextus Empiricus. It is argued that this argument forms a genuine skeptical paradox that has no fully satisfactory resolution. All attempts to resolve it make knowledge or justified belief either intuitively too easy or impossible.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-19
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
233 ( #24,412 of 2,427,832 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #10,349 of 2,427,832 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.