The Jurisdiction Argument for Immigration Control

Social Theory and Practice 42 (3):581-604 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Jurisdictionism offers a new rationale for restricting immigration. Immigrants impose new obligations on the people whose territories they enter. Insofar as these obligations are unwanted, polities are justified in turning immigrants away, so long as the immigrants are from a country that respects their rights. The theory, however, employs a flawed account of obligation, which overlooks how we can be obliged to take on new duties to immigrants. Jurisdictionism also employs different standards when determining whether an obligation exists, only one of which is sensitive to consequences. Finally, the theory falsely claims that obligations necessarily reduce the freedom of the obliged.
ISBN(s)
0037-802X
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAMTJA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-12-25
View other versions
Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
445 (#18,097)

6 months
40 (#20,563)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?