A defence of anti-criterialism

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (5):613-630 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to philosophical orthodoxy, there are informative criteria of identity over time. Anti-criterialism rejects this orthodoxy and claims that there are no such criteria. This paper examines anti-criterialism in the light of recent attacks on the thesis by Matt Duncan, Sydney Shoemaker and Dean Zimmerman. It is argued that those attacks are not successful. Along the way, a novel strategy to defend anti-criterialism against the critics’ most challenging objection is developed. Under-appreciated difficulties for criterialism are also raised which, I claim, there is no obvious way to solve. It is concluded that anti-criterialism may be a much stronger rival to criterialism than is often supposed.
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-29
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
141 ( #38,664 of 64,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #56,461 of 64,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.