A Defense of Shepherd’s Account of Cause and Effect as Synchronous

Journal of Modern Philosophy 2 (1):1 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Lady Mary Shepherd holds that the relation of cause and effect consists of the combination of two objects to create a third object. She also holds that this account implies that causes are synchronous with their effects. There is a single instant in which the objects that are causes combine to create the object which is their effect. Hume argues that cause and effect cannot be synchronous because if they were then the entire chain of successive causes and effects would all collapse into a single moment, and succession would not be possible. I argue that Shepherd has a ready, although implicit response, to Hume’s argument. Since causation is combination on Shepherd’s view, she is free to hold that there are times in between those instants in which combinations occur, during which times other, non-combinatory changes occur, which changes account for succession.

Author's Profile

David Landy
San Francisco State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-18

Downloads
448 (#32,713)

6 months
110 (#28,581)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?