Consuming Fictions Part III: Immersion, Emotion, and the Paradox of Fiction

In Explaining Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 234-261 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chapter considers the “paradox of fiction,” understood as the claim that it is in some sense irrational or inappropriate to respond emotionally to mere fictions. Several theorists have held that special features of imagination, or other “arational” mental reflexes, play a role in its resolution. I argue, to the contrary, that imagination need not enter into the solution, and that the paradox can be resolved in a way that shows our responses to fictions to be reasonable and warranted, even if our emotional reactions to fiction are caused by beliefs and desires. Coming to terms with the paradox requires both properly understanding the “rug-pull” structure of the examples used to motivate it, and appreciating the specific emotional norms relevant to fiction appreciation. Related proposals by Livingston & Mele (1997) and Gilmore (2011) are discussed; their relevance to and coherence with the present account are explained. [This is Chapter 11 of Explaining Imagination.]

Author's Profile

Peter Langland-Hassan
University of Cincinnati

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-23

Downloads
380 (#57,849)

6 months
91 (#60,381)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?