Contingent Composition as Identity

Synthese:1-30 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
When the Necessity of Identity (NI) is combined with Composition as Identity (CAI), the contingency of composition (CC) is at risk. In the extant literature, either NI is seen as the basis for a refutation of CAI or CAI is associated with a theory of modality, such that: either NI is renounced (if counterpart theory is adopted); or CC is renounced (if the theory of modal parts is adopted). In this paper, we investigate the prospects of a new variety of CAI, which aims to preserve both NI and CC. This new variety of CAI (CCAI, Contingent Composition as identity) is the quite natural product of the attempt to make sense of CAI on the background of a broadly Kripkean view of modality, such that one and the same entity is allowed to exist at more than one possible world. CCAI introduces a world-relative kind of identity, which is different from standard identity, and claims that composition is this kind of world-relative identity. CCAI manages to preserve NI and CC. We compare CCAI with Gibbard’s and Gallois’ doctrines of contingent identity and we show that CCAI can be sensibly interpreted as a form of Weak CAI, that is of the thesis that composition is not standard identity, yet is significantly similar to it.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Williamson, Timothy
Naming and Necessity.Kripke, Saul A.
Parthood.Sider, Theodore

View all 56 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
173 ( #17,811 of 41,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #6,047 of 41,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.