Swinburne on the Simplicity of Theism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):409 - 426 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that (1) Richard Swinburne’s general account of the simplicity of empirical hypotheses fails because it involves a deeply problematic notion of postulating a property, while there is a wide range of hypotheses where the assessment of simplicity rests entirely on the number and kinds of postulated properties, (2) Swinburne’s main argument in ’The Christian God’ for the simplicity of theism, the one based on considerations about pure limitless intentional power, is significantly weaker than he seems to believe. The paper does not draw a conclusion about whether theism is simple

Author's Profile

Bruce Langtry
University of Melbourne

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-02

Downloads
1,656 (#5,305)

6 months
132 (#21,748)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?