The Best of Possible Worlds: A Testable Claim of Choice

Theology and Science 4 (3):261-278 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Leibniz said that the universe, if God-created, would exist at a unique, conjoint, physical maximum: Of all possible worlds, it would be richest in phenomena, but its richness would arise from the simplest physical laws and initial conditions. Using concepts of ‘‘variety’’ and algorithmic informational complexity, Leibniz’ claim can be reframed as a testable theory. This theory predicts that the laws and conditions of the actual universe should be simpler, and the universe richer in phenomena, than the presence of observers would require. Tegmark has shown that inhabitants of an infinite multiverse would likely observe simple laws and conditions, but also phenomenal richness just great enough to explain their existence. Empirical observations fit the claim of divine choice better than the claim of an infinite multiverse. The future of the universe, including its future information-processing capacity, is predicted to be endless. -/- .
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LANTBO-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-11-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-11-13

Total views
464 ( #12,727 of 2,439,689 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #16,280 of 2,439,689 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.