Taking Risks Behind the Veil of Ignorance

Ethics 127 (3):610-644 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A natural view in distributive ethics is that everyone's interests matter, but the interests of the relatively worse off matter more than the interests of the relatively better off. I provide a new argument for this view. The argument takes as its starting point the proposal, due to Harsanyi and Rawls, that facts about distributive ethics are discerned from individual preferences in the "original position." I draw on recent work in decision theory, along with an intuitive principle about risk-taking, to derive the view.

Author's Profile

Lara Buchak
Princeton University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-12

Downloads
1,904 (#4,233)

6 months
243 (#8,061)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?