Conceptual Analysis in Metaethics

In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 536-551 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A critical survey of various positions on the nature, use, possession, and analysis of normative concepts. We frame our treatment around G.E. Moore’s Open Question Argument, and the ways metaethicists have responded by departing from a Classical Theory of concepts. In addition to the Classical Theory, we discuss synthetic naturalism, noncognitivism (expressivist and inferentialist), prototype theory, network theory, and empirical linguistic approaches. Although written for a general philosophical audience, we attempt to provide a new perspective and highlight some underappreciated problems about normative concepts.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LASCAI
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-09-21
Latest version: 2 (2019-11-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael

View all 55 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The World is Not Enough.Howard, Nathan Robert & Laskowski, N. G.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-21

Total views
262 ( #16,646 of 48,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
59 ( #10,749 of 48,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.