Single premise deduction and risk

Philosophical Studies 141 (2):157 - 173 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is tempting to think that multi premise closure creates a special class of paradoxes having to do with the accumulation of risks, and that these paradoxes could be escaped by rejecting the principle, while still retaining single premise closure. I argue that single premise deduction is also susceptible to risks. I show that what I take to be the strongest argument for rejecting multi premise closure is also an argument for rejecting single premise closure. Because of the symmetry between the principles, they come as a package: either both will have to be rejected or both will have to be revised.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-12-05
Latest version: 2 (2013-12-05)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
584 ( #8,690 of 58,454 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #13,797 of 58,454 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.