Mining Arguments From 19th Century Philosophical Texts Using Topic Based Modelling

, , , , &
In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining. Baltimore, USA: pp. 79-87 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper we look at the manual analysis of arguments and how this compares to the current state of automatic argument analysis. These considerations are used to develop a new approach combining a machine learning algorithm to extract propositions from text, with a topic model to determine argument structure. The results of this method are compared to a manual analysis.
Keywords
argument mining
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAWMAF-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-22
View other versions
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-03-22

Total views
423 ( #14,167 of 60,975 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #15,119 of 60,975 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
Home | Topics | About PhilArchive | OAI-PMH | Contact us

This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

Page generated Mon Aug 2 11:26:38 2021 on philpapers-web-65948fd446-qrpbq
Debug information

cache stats: hit=16807, miss=20402, save=
autohandler : 480 ms
called component : 472 ms
entry_stats : 426 ms
entry_basics : 28 ms
entry_stats_query : 6 ms
save cache object : 3 ms
get_entry : 3 ms
retrieve cache object : 1 ms
init renderer : 0 ms
setup : 0 ms
auth : 0 ms
stat_db : 0 ms
menu : 0 ms


pid: 174