Mining Arguments From 19th Century Philosophical Texts Using Topic Based Modelling

In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining. Baltimore, USA: pp. 79-87 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper we look at the manual analysis of arguments and how this compares to the current state of automatic argument analysis. These considerations are used to develop a new approach combining a machine learning algorithm to extract propositions from text, with a topic model to determine argument structure. The results of this method are compared to a manual analysis.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LAWMAF-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Argumentation Schemes.Walton, Douglas; Reed, Chris & Macagno, Fabrizio
The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof.Gordon, Thomas F.; Prakken, Henry & Walton, Douglas N.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Multi-Level Computational Methods for Interdisciplinary Research in the HathiTrust Digital Library.Murdock, Jaimie; Allen, Colin; Börner, Katy; Light, Robert; McAlister, Simon; Ravenscroft, Andrew; Rose, Robert; Rose, Doori; Otsuka, Jun; Bourget, David; Lawrence, John & Reed, Chris

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-22

Total views
259 ( #17,251 of 50,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,129 of 50,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.